From: Anton Blanchard I had a problem when compiling a 2.6 kernel with gcc 3.5 CVS. The prototype for prio_tree_remove in mm/prio_tree.c is inside another function. gcc 3.5 gets upset and removes the function completely. Apparently this isnt valid C, so lets fix it up. Details can be found here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17205 Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- 25-akpm/mm/prio_tree.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/prio_tree.c~remove-function-prototype-inside-function mm/prio_tree.c --- 25/mm/prio_tree.c~remove-function-prototype-inside-function 2004-08-27 02:13:01.128907176 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/mm/prio_tree.c 2004-08-27 02:13:01.132906568 -0700 @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static inline unsigned long prio_tree_ma return index_bits_to_maxindex[bits - 1]; } +static void prio_tree_remove(struct prio_tree_root *, struct prio_tree_node *); + /* * Extend a priority search tree so that it can store a node with heap_index * max_heap_index. In the worst case, this algorithm takes O((log n)^2). @@ -90,8 +92,6 @@ static inline unsigned long prio_tree_ma static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_expand(struct prio_tree_root *root, struct prio_tree_node *node, unsigned long max_heap_index) { - static void prio_tree_remove(struct prio_tree_root *, - struct prio_tree_node *); struct prio_tree_node *first = NULL, *prev, *last = NULL; if (max_heap_index > prio_tree_maxindex(root->index_bits)) _